The Black Republican
A defense of the enduring principles upon which the Republican Party was founded
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Why is this blog called              “The Black Republican”?

    Find out at the dedication post. More information about how the blog got started is in the acknowledgements post. An extensive description of those "enduring principles" to which we ascribe is discussed in a post about negroconservatism.

    "...that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom - and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."
             - Abraham Lincoln


  • Abolitionists

    • Ace of Spades HQ
    • Mandy Connell
    • Michelle Malkin
    • Power Line
    • Big Hollywood
    • RedState
    • Big Government
    • ScrappleFace
    • Iowahawk
  • The Union

    • Best of the Web
    • Republican National Committee
    • The Weekly Standard
    • The Corner at NRO
    • The Foundry
    • National Rifle Association
    • Town Hall
  • The Underground Railroad

    • Conservative Brotherhood
    • Booker Rising
    • D.C. Thornton
  • The Telegraph

    • Drudge Report
    • Instapundit
    • RealClearPolitics
    • Newsbusters
    • Pajamas Media
  • Copperheads

    • Country First
    • Dean’s World
    • Hot Air
    • little green footballs
  • Border States

    • FOX News
    • The Washington Times
  • Blockade Runners

    • Media Matters
    • Salon.com
    • Daily Dish
    • The Fourth Turning Forums
  • The Confederacy

    • Democratic Underground
    • The New York Times
  • Massa's Plantation

    • Daily Kos
    • The Huffington Post
  • Ford's Theatre

    • The Onion
    • D&D Online
    • EVE Online
    • World of Warcraft
    • WWIIOL: Battleground Europe
    • Godz Fantasy Leagues
  • The Homestead

    • OConor.net
    • GenericGeek
  •  

    December 2005
    M T W T F S S
    « Nov   Jan »
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  
  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org

Dec

24

2005

Christmas White House Style

Filed Under History, Liberty and Democracy, Politics, Religion | Comments Off

A history of Christmas at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue is presented in an exhibition at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library And Museum. The exhibition is titled, “Christmas At The White House”, and runs through January 8, 2006. Replete with trees decorated in period manner, original ornaments, presidential Christmas cards and other artifacts from celebrations reaching back 200 years, it is a display of a segment of our national heritage.

And we can all take joy in knowing that, at this writing, the ACLU Grinch has been unable to steal this Christmas, or the history of how our Presidents have celebrated the birth of Jesus Christ.

Merry Christmas to all!

Dec

21

2005

I’ll be home for Christmas…

Filed Under War and Terrorism | 1 Comment

A while back my wife forwarded me a poem that, after reading it, I knew I would be posting. It reminded me that with all the hustle and bustle, there are many who – by their own choice – would not be enjoying the season as much. So as you begin your weekend travel plans, start preparing the Christmas pies, wrapping the Chanukah gifts, enjoy all of the festive events of this upcoming Holiday weekend, don’t forget some very important things: Christmas is a celebration of the birth of the Saviour Jesus Christ; the festival of Chanukah celebrates the triumphant return of the Jewish people to the Holy Temple in Jerusalem and the miracle of the oil; and that soldiers, sailors, airmen, marines, and coastguardsmen have been fighting, dying, and standing guard for over 225 years to protect the right of the citizens of this country (and extending that right to freedom loving peoples all over the world) to celebrate Christmas, Chanukah, Ramadan, Diwali, Juneteenth, Cinco De Mayo, Mardi Gras, or whatever other religious or non-religious events they wish, without fear of retaliation.

ChristmasAtArlington2.jpg

Just as in the past, selfless men and women guard our celebrations still, and they ask nothing from us other than our respect, thoughts, and prayers. They understand that they, like their brethren before, are the reason that we can have a safe and peaceful Holiday. So while we open our gifts, eat our meals, and hug our children, we must not forget that somewhere, someone’s son or daughter is risking their life, standing watch on a cold deck, or walking lonely a post, just to make sure we can do so in peace.

The poem did not have a title so I have dubed it

Like my fathers before me.

Read more

Dec

21

2005

Idle chit-chat!

Filed Under War and Terrorism | 1 Comment

Sometime you say something without thinking that turns out to be more profound that you thought it would. Today a co-worker (and frequent commenter here) Sue and I were IM-ing about her son’s adventures playing the PS2 game ‘Call of Duty’. If you are not familiar with the game it is a historical first-person game that places you in an infantry squad in the First Infantry Division (the Big Red One) during that Divisions exploits of WWII. As she was telling us yesterday, he was really loving the game and had played it for two days straight, but then something happened:

Sue: Since Evan’s “buddy” in Call of Duty got killed yesterday, he has not played the game at all!!

Me: War is hell!

Me: Tell him a good soldier doesn’t let his buddy die in vain! He continues the fight – eventually someone gets to go home and grow old!

Sue: Good one. I’ll tell him that. THANKS!

Me: Tell him to watch Saving Private Ryan! Not continuing is the absolute wrong thing to do! It doesn’t necessarily take courage to fight… but it takes a lot of courage to keep fighting!

Sue: Amazingly enough, I’m planning on buying him that movie for Christmas. I thought it might be just the thing he needs.

Me: It will be rough on him – reality is ALWAYS tougher than we think! And though SPR is just a movie, and by definition NOT reality, it comes closer to the real thing than anything else he could (or we would want him to) experience. But it will reinforce that it is up to the living to attach meaning to such sacrifices…. to “earn” what the blood of our buddies has bought.

Having sent that, I then read what I had written… and I couldn’t help but think about how even more disgraceful the actions and words of Murtha, Dean, Kerry and Pelosi really are. What a slap – not to the soldiers, sailors, airmen, marines, and coastguardsmen who will eventually return from this war – but to the ones who won’t!

It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us — that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion — that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain — that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

My Christmas wish? That all American’s could read that statement and shake their heads in agreement.

Hope springs eternal!

Dec

20

2005

Democratic Congressman endorses the return of slavery

Filed Under Race and Prejudice | Comments Off

A major news outlet for most Americans has broken a big story with an interview with Rep. Major Owens (D-New York), revealing his true feelings about slavery.

Businesses would be more profitable if they went back to slavery…. You could work people the way slave masters worked them, from sunup to sundown.
Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

Best of the Web

Dec

20

2005

The rules are different when there is a Democrat in the White House

Filed Under War and Terrorism | Comments Off

Dick Morris – a man who, for a long while, sat at the right hand of President Bill Clinton and who is a also New Yorker – has written a piece in the NYPost skewering Hillary, Chuckie Schumer, and the other Democratic Senators stating that “the Democrats have shown a total disregard for national security.”

While the legislation President Bush proposed extends the entire act, certain key provisions are set to expire at year’s end. (The rest of the act is good until September 2007.) By voting to allow these provisions to lapse, the Democrats have shown a total disregard for national security.

It is particularly galling that Sens. Clinton and Chuck Schumer – whose New York constituents are in the terrorists’ bull’s-eye – voted to let these vital protections expire.

How galling? One of the key provisions due to expire in two weeks is one that President Bill Clinton presented as the cornerstone of his response to the escalation of terrorism in the wake of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.

The measure allows “roving wiretaps” – so that the FBI can tap all phones a suspect uses, rather than just one specific number. Hillary’s vote to let this provision expire is incredible.

Given this bit of information, and the interesting fact that (Clinton-era Deputy Attorney General) Jamie Gorelick has completely contradicted herself in the same manner, I must conclude that Cliff May is correct when he states we now have proof of what many of us have believed for some time: The rules are different when there is a Democrat in the White House.

Big Stovepipe hat tip to Cliff May and Byron York over at The Corner (NRO) and RealClearPolotics

Update: Seems Drudge has uncovered further proof that what’s good for the Democratic goose is outrageous abuse of power for the Republican gander!

Thanks Sue!

Dec

19

2005

Bush address to the nation: “My most solemn responsibility”

Filed Under War and Terrorism | Comments Off

The President had a speech last night on national TV. From most accounts, unless you needed a pep talk or your support for the President has been waning, anti-idiotarians could skip it and not miss much. I’ll leave the details to those not working 70 hours a week outside blogging.

Meanwhile, among detached-reality-Americans…

The speech was, like everything else Bush has said on the topic, a nice object lesson in the rhetorical possibilities of the straw man and the false dilemma. As an effort to smear the opposition, it’s good work. As a serious argument, it’s patronizing and insulting. – Matthew Yglesias
This reminds me of The Princess Bride: I do not think those words mean what he thinks they mean. If there’s a logical proof that, “We support the troops!” is not wholly inconsistant with, “Pull out now!” I’d like to hear it. Please, please, explain it to me. And remember: absurd claims that peaceniks are trying to save the lives of warriors by ending a war don’t qualify as logic.

Dec

18

2005

Kerry Consistent On Domestic Torture

Filed Under History, Law and Ethics, Politics, War and Terrorism | Comments Off

Ever since hearing these words from John Kerry*:

“And there is no reason, Bob, that young American soldiers need to be going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children, you know, women, breaking sort of the customs of the–of–the historical customs, religious customs. Whether you like it or not…

SCHIEFFER: Yeah.

Sen. KERRY: …Iraqis should be doing that….

I have wanted to remind people that Kerry seems to have a consistent appreciation for having a country’s soldiers terrorize children on their own land. For he had no problem with this:

Elián_González_Breaking_News_Photography.GIF

*This is the same John Kerry who contends he served in Vietnam, though he has refused to fulfill his promise to release the military records which could confirm his claim.

Dec

18

2005

Reality Check- Katrina Killed Across Class Lines

Filed Under History, Lies, Corruption and Scandals, Politics, Race and Prejudice | Comments Off

One more myth from the Hurricane Katrina disaster is exposed as false. It wasn’t just the poor that died.

Dec

17

2005

Bush Calls Leak Illegal, Vows To Continue Wiretaps

Filed Under History, Law and Ethics, Liberty and Democracy, Lies, Corruption and Scandals, War and Terrorism | 4 Comments

Once again he makes us proud.

In his radio address today President Bush explained why it is necessary for him to authorize the use of wiretaps against the enemy, and he calls the leaking of that program illegal. I anxiously await the arrest of the perpetrator.

Here is his full speech:

In the weeks following the terrorist attacks on our nation, I authorized the National Security Agency, consistent with U.S. law and the Constitution, to intercept the international communications of people with known links to al Qaeda and related terrorist organizations. Before we intercept these communications, the government must have information that establishes a clear link to these terrorist networks.

This is a highly classified program that is crucial to our national security. Its purpose is to detect and prevent terrorist attacks against the United States, our friends and allies. Yesterday the existence of this secret program was revealed in media reports, after being improperly provided to news organizations. As a result, our enemies have learned information they should not have, and the unauthorized disclosure of this effort damages our national security and puts our citizens at risk. Revealing classified information is illegal, alerts our enemies, and endangers our country.

As the 9/11 Commission pointed out, it was clear that terrorists inside the United States were communicating with terrorists abroad before the September the 11th attacks, and the commission criticized our nation’s inability to uncover links between terrorists here at home and terrorists abroad. Two of the terrorist hijackers who flew a jet into the Pentagon, Nawaf al Hamzi and Khalid al Mihdhar, communicated while they were in the United States to other members of al Qaeda who were overseas. But we didn’t know they were here, until it was too late.

The authorization I gave the National Security Agency after September the 11th helped address that problem in a way that is fully consistent with my constitutional responsibilities and authorities. The activities I have authorized make it more likely that killers like these 9/11 hijackers will be identified and located in time. And the activities conducted under this authorization have helped detect and prevent possible terrorist attacks in the United States and abroad.

The activities I authorized are reviewed approximately every 45 days. Each review is based on a fresh intelligence assessment of terrorist threats to the continuity of our government and the threat of catastrophic damage to our homeland. During each assessment, previous activities under the authorization are reviewed. The review includes approval by our nation’s top legal officials, including the Attorney General and the Counsel to the President. I have reauthorized this program more than 30 times since the September the 11th attacks, and I intend to do so for as long as our nation faces a continuing threat from al Qaeda and related groups.

The NSA’s activities under this authorization are thoroughly reviewed by the Justice Department and NSA’s top legal officials, including NSA’s general counsel and inspector general. Leaders in Congress have been briefed more than a dozen times on this authorization and the activities conducted under it. Intelligence officials involved in this activity also receive extensive training to ensure they perform their duties consistent with the letter and intent of the authorization.

This authorization is a vital tool in our war against the terrorists. It is critical to saving American lives. The American people expect me to do everything in my power under our laws and Constitution to protect them and their civil liberties. And that is exactly what I will continue to do, so long as I’m the President of the United States.

LGF

Dec

16

2005

Tom DeLay has been violated!

Filed Under Law and Ethics | 7 Comments

I was watching Special Report w/Brit Hume last night (as I often do) and he related a story about the political firestorm created by President Bush when he declared, in an interview conducted the night before by the same Brit Hume, that he believed that Tom DeLay was [GASP!] innocent. Here – in context – is exactly what the President said in that interview:

“I want this trial to be conducted as fairly as possible. And the more politics that are in it, the less likely it’s going to be fair,” Bush said. Asked if he thinks DeLay is innocent, Bush responded; “Yes, I do.”
Well, that “Yes, I do.” line seems to have sent Senate Democrats off the deep end because they went absolutely apoplectic. Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) had this to say:
“The president of the United States announced that the jury need not assemble in Texas, that Tom DeLay is innocent. To have someone of his stature that is the president of the United States prejudge the facts on a case is something I’ve never heard of before. And here is a president who believes in law and order?”
Perhaps the Senate Minority Leader hasn’t got the memo yet, but we have a principle in this country that an accused person is “innocent” until proven guilty – not the other way around! But we do know for a fact that Chairman of the Democratic National Committee Howard Dean didn’t get the memo – either that or he just does not believe in the principal because back in May he declared that he [Tom DeLay]:
“ought to go back to Houston where he can serve his jail sentence.”
In case you don’t know the timeline here, May was before DeLay was even indicted. So here we have a prominent Democrat, Howard Dean, proclaiming Tom DeLay guilty before he was even indicted, and another prominent Democrat, Harry Reid, chastising the President for presuming that DeLay is innocent before he has been convicted of any crime.

Given all this, I was all set to criticize the Democrats for not reading and adhering to the US Constitution – but that principal, while implied, is not specifically spelled out in e Constitution. But (surprise, surprise!) it is spelled out in this document – The Universal Declaration of Human Rights:

(1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defense.

That’s right ladies and gentlemen, it seems that Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) and Chairman of the Democratic National Committee Howard Dean have violated Tom DeLays human rights, while the President, by proclaiming his innocence, is championing them.

Someone call AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL!

Dec

15

2005

Question Everything

Filed Under Lies, Corruption and Scandals | Comments Off

Bushfloodfish Hoax Photo.jpg

In the tradition of myth busting for which Snopes.com is famous, I have discovered a site which I recommend. Break The Chain.org is dedicated to helping us, “Stop junk e-mail and misinformation!”, by offering their conclusions about the truth in the various stories which are being sent around the electronic universe.

I came across BreakTheChain while engaged in a face-saving effort to verify the information in an e-mail received today, before I made the unforgivable mistake of sending it on without knowing if it was true. My effort was not wasted, as the story about the soldiers who guard the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier within Arlington National Cemetary, was both true and false.

I replied to the friend who sent the e-mail to me thusly:

I was about to forward this when I remembered who is on my list, and how I was taken to task once before for sending something which one of my friends knew to be false. So, I did some quick research. First I found this site which outlines some of the guard’s specifications. Then I found this site which purports to debunk a few myths in the very language you forwarded to me, while upholding the truth in other parts.

Sorry to be so anal, just thought you’d want to know too.

Rick

That said, the e-mail I received is not entirely true, but the honor of the men who guard the Tomb of the Unknown is true; and I am grateful to have been reminded of their service.

To read the myth busting of the image above of the two Presidents Bush, click on the image.

Dec

15

2005

Speaking truth to power – the right way!

Filed Under History | Comments Off

Hey Howard Dean, you need to scream a bit louder next time…

Iraqi_Freedom.jpg
Iraq_election.jpg
121505_iraq_vote3.jpg
14_24_121205_iraq_vote.jpg

…the people in Iraq seem not to have heard your words that the “idea that we’re going to win the war in Iraq is an idea which is just plain wrong”.

And in case you don’t yet understand the meaning of the images coming out of Iraq, todays election is absolute proof that it is you and those like you who are “just plain wrong.”

Every life lost in this war is not just a tragedy for the families, but a great loss for our country. But if it was worth the cost of 200,000+ precious lives of America’s best and brightest to liberate Europe from the grip of a fascist tyrant, it was certainly worth the cost of 2100 precious lives of America’s best and brightest to liberate Iraq from the grip of a similarly fascist tyrant. To say that it was not is not only a bald faced lie, it smacks of racism. The people of Iraq and the middle east deserve freedom at least as much as the French and Europeans, don’t you think?

Dec

14

2005

Closing Volume III… Starting Volume IV

Filed Under Internet and Blogging | 2 Comments

I cannot let today pass without acknowledging our third blogiversary.

It’s been a tough year. We knew it was going to be a tough one coming in, but we were at times surpised by disaster from unexpected directions. We have seen moments of terrible injustice, disturbing inappropriateness, and hilarious ineptitude.

That said, we have also seen moments of great determination and inspiration. Familiar faces wore new hats, and noble heroes followed radical saints to their great reward.

Skimming back on the year in our archives, I’ve barely begun to recap the best and worst of the last year. Take a trip through the months yourself and tell us in the comments what moments will be most memorable for you. And while you’re doing that…

I think it’s about time we started a tradition that Steve, Rick, and I have mulled over for some time. While skipping through the archives, and as our friends in the MSM begin their “Year in Review” pieces (like TIME Magazine’s “Man of the Year”), take a moment to think who might deserve the honor of Black Republican of the Year.

While I am tempted to nominate our Secretary of State, and despite his many missteps throughout the year, I believe the man who made this happen may be the person most exemplifying the principles and ideals of The Black Republican: George W. Bush.

Who will you nominate?

Dec

13

2005

Brilliance and inspiration

Filed Under Liberty and Democracy | Comments Off

Norman Podhoretz has written a brilliant analysis, and Paul Greenberg has written an inspiring condemnation.

There is little that I can or feel compelled to add other than a hearty “Well done gentlemen. Well done!”

Dec

13

2005

Inspired To Vote Alex

Filed Under History | Comments Off

Won’t you also vote for Alex?

Voting has actually closed, but this wonderful little girl is among the three finalists, let’s hope the panel gives her her due. It is not too late, however, to donate to Alex’s Lemonade Stand.

Next Page →

  • Recommended Reading

  • Obama Tells American Businesses to Drop Dead
  • You can't be prejudiced against an activity
  • Dear Attorney General Holder
  • Obama's $163,000 Tax Bomb
  • Press lapdogs get their leash
  • Ten things you should know about CCW holders
  • Obama's Mideast Pillar
  • The Normalization of Evil
  • Never, ever forget
  • A Minority View
  • Featured Sponsor

  • Recent Comments

    • Chris on Still a Republican
    • wdporter on Still a Republican
    • wdporter on Sorry for the false alarm
    • wdporter on Sorry for the false alarm
    • Chris on The Incorruptible John Kruk
    • the Other Ken on I am American
    • Truth About ObamaCare, Truth About Socialized Medicine Everywhere « Lighthouse Patriot Journal on The proposed National Socialist Health care system…
    • TRW345 on The real Inconvenient Truth
    • mithu on Charismatic Leadership
    • granny3 on Civil War Blogroll Alert: LGF
  • Recent Posts

    • Meek vs. Greene. Really, who cares?
    • A Chaplain’s View from Iraq
    • Still a Republican
    • Bill Bennett speaks for me, too
    • The next big thing
    • Black Republican of the Year 2009
    • Avatar
    • “Let the children come to me”
    • The “Me Too” Party dies a little
    • Purity vs. the “Big Tent”
  • Archives

  • Categories

    • Economics (35)
    • Education (39)
    • Entertainment and Sports (85)
    • Foreign Affairs (41)
    • History (158)
    • Internet and Blogging (128)
    • Law and Ethics (179)
    • Liberty and Democracy (126)
    • Lies, Corruption and Scandals (200)
    • Literature (4)
    • Politics (450)
    • Race and Prejudice (144)
    • Religion (85)
    • Science (35)
    • War and Terrorism (180)
  • Copyright © 2002 - 2009 The Black Republican • Powered by WordPress • Using Blue Zinfandel theme by Brian Gardner