The Black Republican

Bush has taken the right position, we are investigating, and we will know when we have an answer. No one knows when the explosives were moved (other than those that moved them, and they have not come forward), so the right answer is to neither claim to know, or to deny that they were moved while we were guarding them. Kerry, and the media (NY Times, and C-BS Sixty Minutes in a program previously scheduled to air 10/31) all claimed that the explosives were looted after we took control of the site; they made their claims without proof. If you want to quibble about my use of "conspiracy"; I am gratified that you have the ability to discern between that which is proven and that which is charged based on no facts. But, I am now left to wonder why, since you are able to make such judgements and distinctions, you had to ask why President Bush has not "denied it", an individual of such discernment should have been able to draw the correct conclusion on their own?

Ah ha! I just noticed that you misquoted me, I did not use the word "conspired" in any of its forms. I said, "teamed", which can used to mean acting in paralel, without the conotation of acting in consort.

However, I certainly think, based on past history, it could have been a coordinated attack. C-BS did one with Kerry campaign official Joe Lockhart before presenting the forged Air National Guard documents, I wouldn't put it past them to be doing another one here.