Freedom's Century
As the President began his second innagural address today, I told Steve that I thought perhaps he might go so far to make a pledge similar to that made by John F. Kennedy in 1961. Kennedy promised, "I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth."
Almost six years and two presidents after his death, America made good on Jack Kennedy's promise, with just five months to spare.
I envisioned that George Bush would make the commitment, "We shall ensure to all the people of the earth the right to a democratic government by the end of this century."
He came close to making that very pledge the policy of the government.
America's vital interests and our deepest beliefs are now one. From the day of our Founding, we have proclaimed that every man and woman on this earth has rights, and dignity, and matchless value, because they bear the image of the Maker of Heaven and earth. Across the generations we have proclaimed the imperative of self-government, because no one is fit to be a master, and no one deserves to be a slave. Advancing these ideals is the mission that created our Nation. It is the honorable achievement of our fathers. Now it is the urgent requirement of our nation's security, and the calling of our time.Ironic on several levels, the sweeping majesty of the speech is harshly criticized this morning by fellow Republican and speechwriter Peggy Noonan, who seemed to have sat near someone with similar instincts to my own.So it is the policy of the United States to seek and support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture, with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world....
Today, I also speak anew to my fellow citizens:
From all of you, I have asked patience in the hard task of securing America, which you have granted in good measure. Our country has accepted obligations that are difficult to fulfill, and would be dishonorable to abandon. Yet because we have acted in the great liberating tradition of this nation, tens of millions have achieved their freedom. And as hope kindles hope, millions more will find it. By our efforts, we have lit a fire as well - a fire in the minds of men. It warms those who feel its power, it burns those who fight its progress, and one day this untamed fire of freedom will reach the darkest corners of our world.
George W. Bush's second inaugural will no doubt prove historic because it carried a punch, asserting an agenda so sweeping that an observer quipped that by the end he would not have been surprised if the president had announced we were going to colonize Mars.Similar comments could be heard on Fox News last night, where it was noted several times that the President was "swinging for the fences."
Noonan, however, thought the President and his speeachwriter were swinging too hard.
Ending tyranny in the world? Well that's an ambition, and if you're going to have an ambition it might as well be a big one. But this declaration, which is not wrong by any means, seemed to me to land somewhere between dreamy and disturbing. Tyranny is a very bad thing and quite wicked, but one doesn't expect we're going to eradicate it any time soon. Again, this is not heaven, it's earth.I tend to agree with Fred Barnes, who spoke on Special Report's roundtable. "No one said it had to happen in the President's term." It certainly didn't in Kennedy's case, and I believe Bush is thinking much more long-term than some people are.

Comments
I have often wondered if JFK had been told something about our technology that the rest of us were not pivy to know, he set such a bold agenda, he must have known we had the ability if we had the will.
With that in mind, I wonder what Bush knows that the rest of us will learn later that will help to make his agenda succeed. Does he see the development of the internet as a vital tool to world freedom? Has he seen an actuarial table which shows that now is the time when a supporting pronouncement can push it to realisation? Or, has he just seen how completely worthless the previous strategy is, and perhaps he sees that pressuring the world to recognize the virtue in freedom is the only way to get there; maybe it is that simple, a "just say no" strategy for ending oppression. Hey world, just say no to tyranny!
Posted by: Richard | January 22, 2005 06:09 PM
I think in both cases it was just a matter of courage.
Kennedy knew that if we didn't join the space race, the Russians might win the Cold War by blackmail, threatening us with nuclear weapons by sattelite. There was no real downside to his bet, because if we didn't play, we'd lose anyway.
In a similar way, I think Bush looks at the scene and knows he's in a position to make this policy, that if he doesn't no one else will. He's a unique man in a unique position, and in fact, he's already done the hard part. Compared to the choices he's had to make up to now, and the race he had to win, this statement is a no-brainer, totally in keeping with his character. He can't be castigated any worse, so he's got nothing left to lose. Starting with almost nothing, he's won each hand so far, so he might as well go all-in.
Posted by: Chris
|
January 22, 2005 06:32 PM