Yet More Democrat Corruption
It appears that the Clintons learned only one thing from Hillary's cattle futures scandal, they can get rich being crooks. Now, Billy Boy is getting paid big for nothing, no big surprise. And the company paying him is not doing the kind of work expected of them, no big surprise there either.
Further:
The American Thinker notes that the New York Times got scammed on the Burkle/Clinton connection coverage. The AT's source is found here, a piece by Mickey Kaus.
Fact checking, apparently, is no longer a skill needed by the lamestream media. Failure to even look for the truth, yet another symptom presenting in those afflicted with Bush Derangement Syndrome.

Comments
For even more Democratic shenanigans - see www.votinginmemphis.com
Posted by: John Harvey | April 25, 2006 04:32 PM
I can see why there is very little discussion on this blog. Your topics and insights are WHACK
Posted by: eric | April 26, 2006 04:24 PM
First of all, the comment section on this blog is provided as a courtesy to the readers, so they can provide feedback and discussion if they feel they have something meaningful to add or say in rebuttal. Personally, I haven't much use for it, since I say my peace in the articles I post, when I post.
Which brings me to point two: there is very little discussion because we don't get a whole lot of traffic (though more than most, statistically speaking), and both of these are because of our sometimes-fitful, sometimes-non-existent posting rate. Again, this is fine for me, because I'm not here to entertain or enlighten you - I started the site for catharsis, nothing more. Anyone finding insight and/or amusement from what I post is an unexpected though not unpleasant bonus.
Third, and certainly not least, we may be WHACKED, but we do not WHACK. Please learn to conjugate your verbs before attempting to type.
Posted by: Chris
|
April 26, 2006 05:08 PM
Couldn't agree more on the Corrupt Clintons. The braindead MSM never likes to actually cover the news either. It's all about the ratings with the media. It's not even liberal for the most part...it's just pure sensationalism. But not to be outdone, the people on the other side of the aisle are just as crooked.
Posted by: Shawn | April 26, 2006 06:37 PM
He is not conjugating because he is not speaking English. His usage of the word "whack" is Urban, not English. (Don't you just hate it when they interject a foreign word in an attempt to make themselves appear worldly when there are English words which just as easily convey the intended meaning?) Of course, since, in Urban, the word whack has so many meanings, and since eric (with a little "e") provides no context to his appraisal, one is unable to know his true meaning. However, since all of the definitions of "whack" have negative connotations, and since we know that negativity is the native language of Modern Liberals, we can deduce that eric (with a little "e") is a Modern Liberal, and doesn't like this site. Further, as we have determined him to be a Modern Liberal, we can further deduce that he doesn't like anything and has no constructive suggestions which would be 1) workable, or 2)precise.
So, what we have here, is a failure to communicate , by a malcontent, who postures, but is devoid of anything positive or exacting. Or, in order words, he is definition number seven. Diagnosis complete.
Posted by: Richard
|
April 26, 2006 07:31 PM
The Clinton Culture of Corruption saga continues
Posted by: Darrell
|
April 29, 2006 02:32 AM