The Black Republican

The lawsuit was eventually dismissed without proceeding to trial, since Jones was unable to demonstrate any damages;

Long time no speak, M'Friends. Thought I would drop in after a long absence and take a look at your posts.

This one caught my eye. Ready or NOT…here comes the response.

Totaliterian rule is a system that believes that the higher powers should go unchecked (can we say domestic wire-tapping). Checks and balances not only require one branch to be the over-seer of another while another branch oversees it….but it also requires the gathering of information into a fact-based pile instead of an assumption or assumed based pile. This is called an "investigation".

The death of all our loved soilders deserves this type of investigation. Did the President act as a strong leader or a reckless, trigger-happy president? Was Iraq a concern NEEDING to be addressed over the Al-Qaeda or was it part of another agenda. Why did the evidence re: WMDs consist solely of suppositions (remember Powell at the UN presenting drawings of what mobile labs COULD look like and holding up empty vials while spewing suppositions of fear. He has been referenced as that moment being an embarassment – Woodard also references him in PLAN OF ATTACK as being opposed to the leaning of Iraq and the lack of evidence)

This is also the first president that has issued a tax cut during a time of war. How does the war get paid for, therefore? Ah yes, we become in debt to China. Reagan would roll his grave knowing that a Communist country owns USA. So we take Chinese money and fill the pockets of no-bid companies that have strong ties to individuals within the Admin. Our country increases in debt while mongers get rich off war.

After BUSH ststated that the evidence never stated that SADDAM had WMDs….I ask again…..why was Saddam considered more important than AL-QAEDA? The only time AL_QAEDA seems to be referenced is to implement fear and give our "decider" the right to tap domestic phones without a blessing from the courts. Unchecked power once again.

You have to wonder why President Bush has allowed millions of dollars to be spent investigating leaks that, he now admits, came from him. This is why an investigation is warranted. He lied about phone taps stating that they were all going through the courts, it took him years upon years to finally admit that evidence was faulty and that there were no WMDs. His powers to foresee the outcome of action is all but ridiculous. He speculated that the war would take months and also disregarded the sound concerns of a levee break. Is this the quality of a strategically-wise president who knows how to make sound decisions or is he just a completely optimistic moron with no ground plan?

Do you also wonder why Bush wants a looser border between Mexico and US. His buddies who own corporations will make a fortune by paying immigrants minimum wage (which has not been raised in 8 years while healthcare and rent has blossomed 300+%) and not get fined for employing illegal immigrants. i.e. taking jobs away from Americans and to people who are willing to exploit themselves to make end's meat.

RE: the environment…or Mother Nature….this president has been nothing but reckless. The USA is one of 2 countries that refused to follow the G8 majority and take measures to fight Global Warming. He states that it does not exist even though there are reports of the oceans getting warmer, glaciers melting at an accelerated rate, and hurricanes ripping apart our properties and our families. Nah…it's a myth. All these are mere coincidence. Such a reckless regard in order to ensure the aquiring of money is ridiculous. Alternative Energy is the future and, in the meantime, quit giving monies to Saudi Arabia by giving tax cuts to Junior Oil and Gas Exploration in the US. Pull back the general tax cut and only give tax cuts to companies that assist America and provide jobs for Americans. Both Alternative Energy and Junior Oil and Gas will produce a lot of cash, but your Neo-Con prefers to put their money in a stock that they know will grow (i.e. EXXON). That is why "now" matters more than their grandchildren's future. What would Ebanezer do?...this seems to be their creedo. Alternative Energy will be competitive and hard to predict which company will surface as the victor….the very same with Junior Oil and Gas Exploration. This is why they do not want the market to lean that way….but, unfortunately for them, it is.

The media refuses to publish Democrat's views. Why is this? Check out Kerry's views at this site re: IRAQ AN EXIT STRATEGY

Clinton deserved to be investigated regarding matters like Sexual Harassment, but how does his being a cheating husband influence policy. Also regarding SEXUAL HARASSMENT, you shouldn't be so quick to point fingers. I am sure you heard about Bill O'Reilly. How about this link THIS LINK refgarding RUSH LIMBAUGHS statement that Women "Actually Wish" for Sexual Harassment.

Bush has used his unchecked powers to wiretap, hold secret prisons in Europe, hold prisoners with never charging them with a crime, torturing prisoners….kinda sounds like Hitler or 1984….doesn't it?

PS…We are not fighting the War on Terror. We are in the Iraq War…a country that did not perform a terrorist act against the US.

Did you miss me?

Oh yeah….the Paula Jones case was dismissed without proceeding to trial, since Jones was unable to demonstrate any damages;

First of all Walter, congratulations on finding your way to TypeKey. It will save me at least a few minutes of wasted cognition, and your posts will now actually see the light of day. Some might actually stay there...

As for this, I might consider fisking my way through your post later, but for now I have to ask: does Walter's Front have a different opinion, or does it agree with your Back?

Well, I hope my posts foster a productive debate and dialogue instead of getting edited and deleted.

However, if this is a REPUB only site no Liberals allowed, I will happily respect that and not post in the future. But with give comes take....tit for tat....or a compromise if you will. If I remove myself from your site, I expect to be removed from the "comment policy" which I feel exploits and misrepresents my past presence on this site -- my past posts was never to insult, degrade, use vulgarities, or waste one's time with points that cannot be backed up by fact or source. I believe debating individuals who hold opposing stances and idealogues eye-opening, fascinating, and exciting.

Now it is a waste if I am on a non-debate blog. In which case, removing my post and myself would be the ideal route for both parties....along with the "Walter example" in the comment policy.

Hope this message finds THE BLACK REPUBS well.