If you don't vote for him, he can't win
I am greatly disturbed by some attitudes when it comes to choosing a presidential candidate. I keep hearing, "I like (enter candidate name here) but I'm not voting for him because he can't win."
If our founding fathers had this same mentality, on June 7, 1776, when Richard Henry Lee's resolution was received by Congress urging them to declare independence from the British Empire, it would have been voted down "because we can't win". Never before, in the known history of the world, had this radical idea been successful. If it weren't for those brave men who adopted the idea and acted upon this no-win idea, we would not be the country we are today.
I guess I shouldn't be surprised that some are so concerned about being with the winner that they will put aside their basic beliefs to simply be on the winning side. After all, back in 1776 they had a term for the people who were determined to be on the winning side: they were called turncoats.
All elections are important, especially this Presidential election. To sacrifice what you think is right simply to cast your vote for the candidate that others say will win, regardless of your beliefs, is a complete waste of your vote. When you enter that voting booth in January, February, or whatever month your state's primary is held, vote for the candidate of your choosing because if you don't vote for him, he can't win.

Comments
You are so right! Hunter 2008 or Bust!
Posted by: jtb-in-texas | December 4, 2007 04:34 PM