« January 2003 | Main | February 2004 »

January 31, 2004

Teen Blogger Turns Heads Online

I strongly suggest this piece by Ryan Singel, Wired News as "Recommended Reading".

January 30, 2004

An Illustrator Draws the Line

I strongly suggest this piece by Tunku Varadarajan, Wall Street Journal as "Recommended Reading".

Patient Rage

I strongly suggest this piece by Daniel Henninger as "Recommended Reading".

GOP Wake-Up Call

I strongly suggest this piece by Wall Street Journal as "Recommended Reading".

An Interview with Sandy Rios: Banning Gay Marriage Tops CWA Agenda

I strongly suggest this piece by Human Events as "Recommended Reading".

January 27, 2004

Our Border Brigades

I strongly suggest this piece by Wall Street Journal as "Recommended Reading".

January 25, 2004

England: Killing children with defects acceptable

I strongly suggest this piece by Scotland on Sunday as "Recommended Reading".

Don't measure the poor by their poverty!

The "I'm more sympathetic than you" crowd has a new gold standard: no one is allowed to measure poverty in terms of wealth.It's a lazy Sunday afternoon, so I thought I'd check out what's tripping across the Fox News wire. I should have stayed in bed this morning.

But alas, at least I have a bed. Unlike most poor Americans, right? Think again:

According to a recent study by the Heritage Foundation, 46 percent of the technically "poor" live in their own homes, most with more living space than the average person in Paris, London or Vienna. While 73 percent own at least one car, 30 percent own two or more, and 76 percent have air conditioning. Also, according to the study, 65 percent have a washing machine, 97 percent have a color TV and 78 percent have a DVD player or VCR.
Of course, a large part of this incongruity is that most "poor" people aren't really "poor". In the complicated dance that is class warfare politics, the Democrats have for years been defining poverty up (while defining wealth down - all the better to tax you with, my dear). Many Americans, beset by high taxes and forgetting who has put them in this bind, go along with the classification on the supposition that things have to be getting worse for "poor people" (whoever that means) because they themselves feel so squeezed right now, too. But when the Heritage Foundation tries to inject logic into the Democrats' carefully constructed house of cards, the rhetoric rises to new levels of stupidity - not to mention vicious exploitation, mostly for effect on racial politics.
"I just think that measuring quality of life in the United States -- or for that matter anywhere -- by material possessions is morally bankrupt," said Bob Erlenbusch with the Los Angeles Coalition to End Hunger. "We've got in L.A. County on any given night, 80,000 to 90,000 people who are homeless."
I won't even bother to get into a debate over the accuracy of those numbers, the stupidity of what constitutes "homeless", how those people got there, or why - with all the money we spend on the problem - how they stay that way. And I won't discuss the fact that L.A. county is the home of some of the most affluent liberals in the country, all of whom seem to go out and sleep on a heating vent once or twice a year, like Charlie Sheen. No, I'll leave that for some other time.

For now, let's concentrate on the first part of the quote, the part where a guy whose job is to make white liberals feel guilty about not being poor in LA (and we all know who that would be, don't we?) rails against the concept of measuring how many poor people there are at all. And rails against using wealth as the yardstick against which we would take that measure. And he says this right before he himself quotes numbers based on how many people don't have a house to live in... which is a fairly substantial "material possession" isn't it? How does all this work inside a liberal mind?

Oh, wait... there's video footage of that already, isn't there?

January 24, 2004

Conservatives: Reset Your Course

I strongly suggest this piece by Rep. Mike Pence (R-Indiana) as "Recommended Reading".

January 23, 2004

The Good Son

I strongly suggest this piece by Wall Street Journal as "Recommended Reading".

January 22, 2004

The Diversity Taboo

I strongly suggest this piece by Heather MacDonald as "Recommended Reading".

Smearing Judge Pickering

I strongly suggest this piece by The Washington Times as "Recommended Reading".

'Passion' and Intrigue

I strongly suggest this piece by Peggy Noonan as "Recommended Reading".

January 21, 2004

The Limits of Rage

I strongly suggest this piece by The Wall Street Journal as "Recommended Reading".

"Honoring" Dr. King?

Yet another example of the twisted racism that has perverted King's Dream. As you read the excerpt from James Taranto below (borrowed from an omaha.com article), just remember... this happened at a SCHOOL!!!  I think it speaks for itself...

Four students at Omaha, Neb.'s Westside High School are in trouble for distributing a poster urging the school to give Trevor Richards its "Distinguished African American Student Award," the Omaha World Harold reports. Although the school refuses to say what punishments it meted out, Trevor's mother says he was suspended for two days for hanging the poster.

Trevor is in fact African-Ameircan; indeed, he's an immigrant from South Africa. But school officials say he's ineligible for the award--which is given out every Martin Luther King Day--because he's a person of pallor. One of the four students "was punished for circulating a petition Tuesday morning in support of the boys."

So not only is the school "honoring" Dr. King by judging students on the color of their skin rather than the content of their character; they're punishing anyone who dares question their policies.

January 20, 2004

Silly me... Jesse Jackson, that's who

One of the things that happens when a new holiday takes root is that myths about the memorialized person or event are propagated. Another thing that happens is that the holiday becomes a call-to-arms for divergent views - especially views that run counter to the original intent of the founders or the opinions of the honoree. We can see this happening today in articles referring to MLK Day.

Probably the most ironic of the divergent views put forward yesterday comes from none other than Jesse Jackson, who would have us believe not an inch of progress has been made since 1963.

In Harrisonburg, Va., the Rev. Jesse Jackson said political leaders have been "romanticizing" King and taking his remarks out of context. He said a common misconception is that sentiments from King's "I Have a Dream" speech have been fulfilled, Jackson told a crowd of more than 1,000 at James Madison University.

"I was with him on his deathbed in Memphis," said Jackson. "These past years I have become more anxious -- and sometimes disturbed -- at the celebration of Dr. King's birthday and the romanticizing of his life."
That Jesse Jackson wouldn't want his meal ticket co-opted by anyone actually finding The Dream fulfilled goes without saying. But I find it hard to believe that Jackson could not foresee when he lobbied for the establishment of the holiday that people might actually say nice things about King on that day.

And it only took 48 hours after I wrote my last post to be told how wrong I was.

Drunken GOP Sailors

I strongly suggest this piece by The Wall Street Journal as "Recommended Reading".

Welsh star in race row

I strongly suggest this piece by Wales on Sunday as "Recommended Reading".

January 19, 2004

Bush Has Made 46% of His Campaign Promises

I strongly suggest this piece by Ron Hutcheson & William Douglas as "Recommended Reading".

January 18, 2004

Who dares say he's wrong?

I noticed this headline peeking out at me from the "U.S. National News" section on my MyYahoo! page: Powell Recalls King's Efforts for Blacks. This article mentions that Colin Powell is currently the U.S. Secretary of State, and once served as the nation's senior uniformed military officer as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. And it mentions that this man is black. But what I find significant is that neither reference alludes to the fact that he was the first "person of color" to ever do so - in fact it doesn't even hint that there's anything unusual about the man's high office or exemplary resumé.

A cynic might point out that making note of these achievements would require one to think about the two Presidential Administrations that placed a black man into such high positions, and the political party of those Administrations. The same cynic might argue this would also lead to similar questions regarding Clarence Thomas, Condaleeza Rice, Rodney Paige, and Alphonso Jackson, who together represent the most significant assemblage of blacks in appointed offices in American history.

I would contend however, that the reason why the "achievement" of appointing and retaining a new record number of blacks in high office is not in print is because making note of the fact runs the risk of diminishing it. We must lead not by word, but by example. We must not reduce any man to a token on account of his religion, his ethnicity, his race - or his color. We will achieve The Dream when all thought of "firsts" is but a distant memory, and a portrait of the President and his Cabinet engenders but once thought in the nation's conscience:

Here is a collection of people of the finest character America has to offer.

Power struggle roils Democrats

I strongly suggest this piece by Donald Lambro as "Recommended Reading".

January 17, 2004

Israel takes a stand

I strongly suggest this piece by littlegreenfootballs as "Recommended Reading".

January 15, 2004

The Joke Is on Liberals...

I strongly suggest this piece by Dennis Miller as "Recommended Reading".

January 14, 2004

'Rachel Araflat'

I strongly suggest this piece by littlegreenfootballs as "Recommended Reading".

January 13, 2004

'Breeders' Beware: The Bay Area

I strongly suggest this piece by Jennifer Nelson as "Recommended Reading".

A Man, a Planet

I strongly suggest this piece by Brendan Miniter as "Recommended Reading".

Minority Report

I strongly suggest this piece by Cox & Forkum as "Recommended Reading".

Saint Rachel goes for the win

I strongly suggest this piece by littlegreenfootballs as "Recommended Reading".

January 12, 2004

Actors' Politics Pollute Tolkien's

I strongly suggest this piece by Michael Medved as "Recommended Reading".

January 11, 2004

In God He Trusts

I strongly suggest this piece by Christopher Buckley as "Recommended Reading".

About the Editorial Page

I strongly suggest this piece by The Wall Street Journal as "Recommended Reading".

Taliban Lite

I strongly suggest this piece by Cox & Forkum as "Recommended Reading".

January 09, 2004

God and Green Mountains

I strongly suggest this piece by Geoffrey Norman as "Recommended Reading".

The last refuge of the defeated

I strongly suggest this piece by Mark Steyn as "Recommended Reading".

January 07, 2004

Public Service Announcement (there is no Noble Prize for Economics)

I strongly suggest this piece by Colby Cosh as "Recommended Reading".

Semi-Semites

I strongly suggest this piece by Julia Gorin as "Recommended Reading".

Sponsored Ads



(Google ads are not endorsed by nor are they an endorsement of the contents of The Black Republican)

vg_180x150.gif